Topography and Eddies modulate the widths of the Western Boundary
ID:896
Poster Presentation
2027-01-15 17:15 (China Standard Time)
Session:Session 12 - Abyssal Circulation and Multiscale Dynamics: Processes, Interactions, and Climate Implications
Abstract
Abstract
The widths of western boundary currents (WBCs) have been investigated since the pioneering studies of Stommel (1948) and Munk (1950) on western intensification. Nevertheless, the governing dynamics remain opaque. Satellite observations have demonstrated that the widths of WBCs exhibit complex spatial variability. The magnitudes of the classical Stommel, Munk and inertial boundary layer scales are far smaller than the observed widths of WBCs. The Rhines scale has been found to be consistent with the observed width of WBCs in terms of both magnitude and along-stream variation, showing the influences of the eddies. However, these correlations are subject to modulation by topographic slope. The correlation between topographic slope and current width is generally negative. In circumstances where topographic slope varies continuously and substantially along the current path, the width response lags the topographic variation by approximately 2–3°. These findings have been corroborated by idealized numerical experiments in the MITgcm model. In summary, the Rhines scale provides a reasonable estimate of the fundamental width of WBCs. Furthermore, the topography modulates their width through a conditional, lagged downstream response. The details dynamic should be investigated further.
The widths of western boundary currents (WBCs) have been investigated since the pioneering studies of Stommel (1948) and Munk (1950) on western intensification. Nevertheless, the governing dynamics remain opaque. Satellite observations have demonstrated that the widths of WBCs exhibit complex spatial variability. The magnitudes of the classical Stommel, Munk and inertial boundary layer scales are far smaller than the observed widths of WBCs. The Rhines scale has been found to be consistent with the observed width of WBCs in terms of both magnitude and along-stream variation, showing the influences of the eddies. However, these correlations are subject to modulation by topographic slope. The correlation between topographic slope and current width is generally negative. In circumstances where topographic slope varies continuously and substantially along the current path, the width response lags the topographic variation by approximately 2–3°. These findings have been corroborated by idealized numerical experiments in the MITgcm model. In summary, the Rhines scale provides a reasonable estimate of the fundamental width of WBCs. Furthermore, the topography modulates their width through a conditional, lagged downstream response. The details dynamic should be investigated further.
Speaker
Author
Important Dates
-
Jan 30
2026
Session / Event proposals open
-
Mar 31
2026
Session / Event proposals close
(Extended to April 7) -
Apr 30
2026
Session acceptance notifications
-
Apr 30
2026
Abstract submissions & registration open
-
Jun 30
2026
Abstract submissions close
(Extended to July 21) -
Aug 31
2026
Abstract acceptance notifications
-
Sep 15
2026
Scientific program released
-
Oct 15
2026
Early bird registration closes
-
Jan 12–15
2027
XMAS 2027
